SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 1963

Supreme Court Of India
S.P. BHARUCHA, N. SANTOSH HEGDE AND Y.K. SABHARWAL, JJ

CIT, MADRAS Appellant;
Versus
LUCAS T. V.S. LTD -Respondent.
Civil Appeals Nos. 4789-90 of 1998
Decided on December 5, 2000

The court upheld the decisions of the lower courts based on the facts available.

Headnote:

Persuasive Argument - Revenue - The court upheld the view taken by the Tribunal and the High Court despite persuasive arguments from the Revenue.

Fact of the Case:

The court heard the arguments from the Revenue but upheld the view taken by the Tribunal and the High Court.

Finding of the Court:

The court dismissed the appeals despite the persuasive argument from the Revenue.

Issues: The issue was whether to uphold the view taken by the Tribunal and the High Court despite the persuasive argument from the Revenue.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the facts available and the view taken by the Tribunal and the High Court.

Final Decision: The appeals were dismissed with no order as to costs.

ORDER

1. We have heard learned counsel for the Revenue. Despite his very-persuasive argument, we are, on the facts available to us, unable to take a view other than that taken by the Tribunal and the High Court.

2.The appeals are dismissed.

3.No order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top