SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 1138

Supreme Court Of India
PATEL DAHYABHAI MOTIBHAI (DEAD) BY LRS
Versus
PARMAR SURABHAI MANGALBHAI
Decided On : (July 21, 2000)

The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution because the legal representatives of the appellant failed to effectively pursue the case, specifically by failing to pay the required process fees and file necessary applications.

Headnote:

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 22, Rules 3 and 11 - Substitution of LRs - LRs of appellant except writing a letter to the Assistant Registrar of Supreme Court, not prosecuting the appeals effectively- Necessary applications and process fee have not paid- Therefore appeal dismissed for non-prosecution [Paras 1 and 2]

Act Referred

CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE: O.22 R.3, O.22 R.11
SUPREME COURT RULES: O.15 R.33, O.15 R.32, O.15 R.34, O.15 R.30

Legal Category Hierarchy

  • practice and procedure
    • civil procedure
      • dismissal for non-prosecution (Para 1, 2)

Table of Contents

1. Appeal proceedings — Failure of legal representatives to prosecute effectively — Non-payment of process fees. (Para 1 )

2. Legal representatives failed to effectively prosecute the appeal by neglecting to file necessary applications and pay process fees. (Para 1 )

3. Failure to effectively prosecute an appeal, including non-payment of process fees, justifies dismissal for non-prosecution. (Para 1 , 2 )

4. Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution. (Para 2 )

5. Under what circumstances can an appeal be dismissed for non-prosecution?

An appeal may be dismissed for non-prosecution when the legal representatives fail to prosecute the matter effectively, such as by failing to file necessary applications or pay required process fees. (Para 1 , 2 )

( 1 ) WE find that, except writing a letter dated 11-10-1999 to the Assistant registrar of this Court, the so-called legal representatives of the appellant are not prosecuting these appeals effectively. Necessary applications and process fee have not been paid.

( 2 ) IN these circumstances, we have no choice, but to dismiss this appeal for non-prosecution and we do so.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top