SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 1866

M.JAGANNADHA RAO, M.B.SHAH
M. C. MEHTA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


( 1 ) ISSUE notice.

( 2 ) LEARNED counsel Mr C. V. Subba Rao accepts notice on behalf of the union of India.

( 3 ) LEARNED Solicitor-General seeks and is granted four weeks time for filing counter-affidavit.

( 4 ) BOTH the IAs to be taken up together. Court Masters ia No. 111

( 5 ) LIST the IA for orders on 23-11-2000. IAs Nos. 64 and 65

( 6 ) IN the order dated 7-11-2000 for the words "district Judge" the words "district Magistrate" are substituted.

( 7 ) IN respect of order dated 14-11-2000 the following corrections are made: for the words "regarding the rest of the industries other than 40 foundry industries, it would be open to them to switch over to gas-based cupola or to shift to other plots which are allotted to them by the ADA outside the area of Taj Trapezium" the words "regarding the rest of the industries other than 40 foundry industries, it would be open to them to switch over to gas-based technology or electricity or any better eco-friendly (other than coal, coke or diesel) non-polluting technology or to shift to other plots which are allotted to them by the ADA outside the area of Taj trapezium", are substituted.

( 8 ) FOR the words "it is however, made clear that, inas




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top