SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 1723

UMESH C.BANERJEE, K.G.BALAKRISHNAN
Oriental Insurance Company LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Khajuni Devi – Respondent


( 1 ) IN spite of service of notice no one appears for the respondents. Be that as it may, upon hearing the learned counsel for the appellant, we find that the law in regard to the relevant date for determining the rights and liabilities under the Workmens Compensation Act has been settled by a three-Judge Bench of this court in Kerala SEB v. Valsala K. AIR 1999 sc 3502 : 1999 (8) SC 254: 1999-II-LLJ-l112. In Valsala case (supra) the decision of the two-Judge Bench in New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. V. K. Neelakandan (CAs Nos. 16904-09 of 1996, decided on November 6, 1996) stands overruled and the instant judgment under appeal having been on specific reliance on an overruled judgment, we do find some force in the submission of the learned advocate that valsala case (supra) has its application in all force in the contextual facts. In that view of the matter the law as declared in Valsala case (supra) should be made applicable in the present case. The appeals are, therefore, allowed. The order of the High Court stands set aside. No order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top