N.S.HEGDE, A.S.ANAND, K.G.BALAKRISHNAN
LAXMI DEVI – Appellant
Versus
RAJESH KUMAR SANADHYA – Respondent
( 1 ) THE parties were married on 3-3-1990. There are three children from the wedlock. It appears that relations between the parties got strained. The respondent has filed a suit under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act for dissolution of marriage which is pending in the Family Court at Udaipur. According to the petitioner, she is living with her father along with the children born from the wedlock. She submits that it is not possible for her to defend herself properly at Udaipur and prays for the case to be transferred to mathura. Our attention has also been drawn by learned counsel for the petitioner to certain admissions made in the counter-affidavit filed by the respondent to the effect that he has embraced Islam religion.
( 2 ) WITHOUT expressing any opinion on the merits of the case between the parties, but keeping in view the affidavit filed in support of the application for transfer, it appears appropriate to us to allow this application but instead of transferring the case to the Court of District Judge, Mathura, in our opinion, it would be appropriate to transfer the case to the file of the District Judge, agra, who may either try the case himself or assign it to any ot
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.