SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(SC) 903

B.N.AGARWAL, K.T.THOMAS, R.P.SETHI
Suo Motu Proceedings against Mr. R. Karuppan, Advocate – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Judgment

SETHI, J.

( 1 ) PROCLAIMING to be its President, the respondent Sh. R. Karuppan filed a writ petition in the name of Madras High Court Advocates Association praying for issuance of writ of Quo Warranto against the Honble Chief Justice of India. He also prayed this Court to determine the age of the first respondent in the writ petition as 1-11-1934 and further that the first respondent had attained the age of superannuation on 31/10/1999 and had ceased to hold the office since then. In support of the averments made in the writ petition Shri R. Karuppan (hereinafter referred to as "the respondent") also filed an affidavit.

( 2 ) BEFORE the matter was taken up for admission, the Registry of this Court received a petition signed by a number of Advocates claiming to be the members of the said Association and alleging that the Association had not authorised the respondent to file any writ petition in the name of the Association. Ignoring the disputes stated to be existing amongst the members of the Advocates Association, we proceeded to consider the writ petition on the assumption that the petition was either filed on behalf of the Association or by the respondent on his own in hi














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top