SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(SC) 856

G.B.PATTANAIK, B.N.AGARWAL
CHAITANYA AMBALAL SOMANI – Appellant
Versus
PRAVINCHANDRA D. RANA – Respondent


( 1 ) IN this Appeal No. 14404 of 1996, the appellant, who was selected and promoted on ad hoc basis as Assistant Engineer in the Union Territory of daman and Diu, assailed the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, bombay Bench, in OA No. 1053 of 1992. Respondent 1 who was also a junior Engineer along with the appellant in the said Union Territory, filed an application before the Tribunal contending, inter alia, that the Departmental promotion Committee did not take the appropriate criteria for adjudging the inter se seniority for promotion in question and that the Departmental promotion Committee was not duly constituted in accordance with the relevant office memorandum and as such the decision taken by the said departmental Promotion Committee is vitiated. The Tribunal relying upon the earlier decision of the said Tribunal having set aside the appointment made in favour of the appellant, the present appeal has been preferred.

( 2 ) ON the facts averred, it appears that the appellant was appointed as junior Engineer in January 1976 whereas Respondent 1, who was the applicant before the Tribunal was appointed as Junior Engineer on 6-2-1976. A post of Assistant Engineer havi






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top