( 1 ) DELAY condoned.

( 2 ) HAVING heard Mr Dwivedi, learned Senior Counsel at length and on examining the impugned order of the High Court as well as the order of the minister concerned on the question of withdrawing from the acquisition already made, we have no hesitation in coming to the conclusion that the said order of the Minister does not suffer from any apparent error requiring to be corrected by the High Court in exercise of its power under Article 226 of the constitution of India. The High Court after a detailed examination of the materials on record having dismissed the writ petition for the reasons indicated therein, we find that no case for our interference under Article 136 of the Constitution has been made out. Nonetheless, the applicant before us being an engineering institution for whose benefit the land had been acquired, we examined the order passed by the Minister concerned, withdrawing from the acquisition and all the relevant materials. We could not find any apparent error in the said order, requiring interference by the High court or this Court. It is well settled that an order of an inferior tribunal or a statutory authority could be interfered with by the H