SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(SC) 1052

S.C.AGRAWAL, N.VENKATACHALA, A.M.AHMADI
DIDAR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
ISHAR SINGH (DEAD) BY LRS. – Respondent


ORDER

Civil Appeals Nos. 4823-28 of 1984

1. These six appeals arise out of the judgment rendered in Regular Second Appeal No. 251 of 1981 by learned Single Judge of the Punjab and Haryana High Court on 25-7-1984 which came to be followed in Second Appeals Nos. 252-56 of 1981. As the issue involved in these appeals is identical, we propose to dispose of all the appeals by this common order.

2. The factual matrix is that the appellants purchased different parcels of land situate in the city of Ambala under separate registered sale deeds. The respondent, who was tenant in respect of the said lands, instituted suits to enforce the right of pre-emption conferred by Section 15 of the Punjab Preemption Act, 1913 as adopted in the State of Haryana under the Haryana Adaptation of Laws Order, 1968. The suits were decreed by separate judgments rendered on 30-9-1980. By the said judgment and decree the respondents right of pre-emption was recognised and he was granted time to deposit the court fee within one month and the remaining 4/5th sale price by 27 -11-1980. Admittedly, the respondent complied with these conditions within the time allowed by the decree.

3. It appears that in the meantime








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top