SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 991

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
S.C. SEN AND S.P. KURDUKAR, n.)
ESS KAY ENGINEERING CO. (P) LTD...Appellant;
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AMRITSAR ..Respondent.
Civil Appeal No. 2577 of 1982
Decided on July 23,1997

Important Points

Reopening of a tax assessment is permissible if based on fresh material and not a mere change of opinion, even if the assessee's position was accepted in the original assessment for that year.

Subject

Tax Law - Income Tax

Act Referred

Headnote

(A) Income Tax - Reopening of assessment - Material available for reopening - Not a case of mere change of opinion - Acceptance of assessee's case in original assessment does not preclude reopening of assessment for an earlier year based on findings of fact made on the basis of fresh materials in the course of assessment of the next assessment year.

Facts of the case:
An assessment for an earlier year was reopened by the tax authorities based on fresh materials and findings of fact discovered during the assessment of a subsequent year. The assessee challenged this reopening on the ground that their case had been accepted as correct in the original assessment for that specific assessment year.

Findings of Court:
The court found that there was sufficient material on the basis of which the officer could proceed to reopen the case and that the action did not constitute a mere change of opinion.

Issues: Whether the tax authorities are precluded from reopening an assessment of an earlier year if the assessee's case was accepted in the original assessment, provided fresh materials are found during a subsequent year's assessment.

Ratio Decidendi: The acceptance of an assessee's case in the original assessment does not prevent the reopening of that assessment if the officer discovers fresh materials during the assessment of a later year that justify such a reopening, provided the proceeding is based on material and not a mere change of opinion.

Result: Appeal dismissed.

Legal Category Hierarchy

  • tax law
    • income tax
      • assessment
        • reopening of assessment

ORDER

This is a case of reopening. We have perused the documents. We find there was material on the basis of which the Income Tax Officer could proceed to reopen the case. It is not a case of mere change of opinion. We are not inclined to interfere with the decision of the High Court merely because the case of the assessee was accepted as correct in the original assessment for this assessment year. It does not preclude the Income Tax Officer from reopening the assessment of an earlier year on the basis of his findings of fact a made on the basis of fresh materials in course of assessment of the next assessment year. The appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top