SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(SC) 1499

D.P.WADHWA, M.B.SHAH, M.JAGANNADHA RAO
Indira Sawhney – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Judgment

M. JAGANNADHA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE cases in this batch raise common issues relating to the identification of creamy layer among the Backward Classes in the State of Kerala and the implementation of the law declared and directions issued in Indra Sawhney v. Union of India, 1992 (Suppl) 3 SCC 217 : (1992 AIR SCW 3682 : AIR 1993 SC 477 : 1993 Lab IC 129 ). The State of Kerala took time for implementation of the directions in Indra Sawhney for appointment of a Commission for the purpose of identifying the creamy layer in the State but it failed to appoint a Commission or to proceed with the implementation. Indra Sawhney was decided in 1992. For more than three years the State of Kerala did not implement the judgment. This Court by its order dated 10-7-1995 held (in IAs. 35, 36 filed by the State for extension of time etc.) that the State of Kerala, represented by its Chief Secretary was guilty of contempt but gave a further opportunity to the State to purge the contempt and adjourned the matter to 11-9-1995. It was made clear that if the directions of this Court were not complied with, the Chief Secretary would run the risk of being sentenced. Having sought time for years to appoin





























































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top