SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(SC) 700

B.P.SINGH, ALTAMAS KABIR
Secretary, P. W. D. – Appellant
Versus
D. P. Construction – Respondent


JUDGMENT

We have heard counsel for the parties.

2. Special leave granted.

3. The order impugned in this appeal by special leave is the order passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Madras in Writ Appeal No. 2484/2004 whereby the writ appeal preferred by the Government has been dismissed upholding the direction of the learned Single Judge that the appellants shall despatch tender notices to the respondent herein in the pre-stamped covers offered by him, by registered post with acknowledgment due. Counsel for the appellants submitted that under the Tamil Nadu Transparency in Tenders Rules, 2000 procedure has been prescribed laying down the manner in which the notice of tenders has to be given to the concerned parties. In particular, he relies upon Rules 8, 9, 11 and 12 of the said Rules and submits that depending on valuation of the tender different modes of publication have been provided under the Rules which include, in the case of tenders below Rs. 10 lakhs, publication on the notice board and intimation to the registered tenderers by post under certificate of posting. He further submitted that it will be difficult for the department to maintain an account of th





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top