JUDGMENT

Arijit Pasayat, J.—Leave granted.

2. Challenge in these appeals is to the order of the learned Single Judge of the Orissa High Court granting bail to the respondent no.2 in each case. In criminal Appeal relating to SLP (Criminal) 3745 of 2006 respondent no.2 is Bimal Kumar Khetan whereas in the criminal appeal relating to SLP (Criminal) 3746 of 2006, the respondent no.2 is Sunil Kumar Khetan. The primary stand of the appellant is that the bail was granted without application of mind, as no reason was indicated as to why respondent no.2 (hereinafter referred to as the accused) was entitled to bail. It is pointed out that earlier several petitions were rejected by leaned Additional Sessions Judge and the High Court.

3. It is unnecessary to elaborately state the factual position as stated by the appellant.

4. Bimal was married to the daughter of the appellant i.e. Manisha (hereinafter referred to as deceased). The marriage between the deceased and the said accused took place on 9.5.2005. Within five months of marriage, the deceased was found dead on 1.10.2005. The appellant lodged FIR at the Jharsuguda police station and on the basis case was registered and investigation was