SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(SC) 988

MARKANDEY KATJU, S.B.SINHA
R. Sundararajan – Appellant
Versus
State by D. S. P. , SPE, CBI, Chennai – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Markandey Katju, J.—Leave granted.

2. This appeal has been filed against the impugned judgment of the Madras High Court dated 31.01.2006 by which the appeal of the accused-appellant against his conviction under Section 7 read with Section 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act by the Trial Court was upheld.

3. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

4. The facts in brief are that the appellant (hereinafter referred to as ‘the accused’) was employed as group “D” staff, A/C and Power, Harbour Telephone Exchange, Chennai-1 and as such, he was a public servant. It is alleged that the accused demanded and accepted a sum of Rs. 1500/- on 9.11.1992 from Kumaresan (P.W. 2), who is the cousin of Tmt. Nagalakshmi at No. 38, Mosque street, Vadapalani, Chennai-26, as illegal gratification for getting permanent telephone connection under OYT. The amount was demanded at 8.05 p.m. on 9.11.1992 in the house of Tmt. Nagalakshmi and the appellant was caught red handed while demanding and accepting the illegal gratification.

5. Jayakumar (P.W. 5), who is the younger brother of the accused has been working as LDC in Madras Telephones Commercial Section (South), G.R. Complex,












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top