SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 432

N.P.SINGH, B.N.KIRPAL, J.S.VERMA
Modi Industries LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Order

1.In compliance with our order dated 30-1-1996 an additional affidavit on behalf of the Union of India has been filed by Shri Deepak Khandekar Deputy Secretary to Government of India. In the additional affidavit, it has been expressly stated that while determining the minimum cane price of levy sugar regard has been only to the minimum cane price as spoken to in Section 3 (3-C) (a) of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 and the additional cane price payable under clause 5-A of the Sugar (Control) order, 1966, has not been taken into account and that also there has been no mopping up of excess realization on levy-free sale sugar while fixing the price of levy sugar for the season 1982-83.

2.2. In view of the above further statement made in the additional affidavit filed on behalf of the Union of India, we are satisfied that this matter is not covered by the decision of this Court in Shri Malaprabha Coop. Sugar Factory ltd. V. Union of India. Accordingly the transferred case is dismissed. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top