1. Vehicular accident — Grievous injuries — Claim for compensation — Dispute over quantum awarded for pain, shock, and suffering. (Para 2 )
Back
Next 
1998 Supreme(SC) 462
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
AMAR SINGH
Versus
ISHWAR
Decided on : April 6, 1998
Important Points
Compensation for pain, shock, and suffering in a vehicular accident can be enhanced based on the prolonged hospitalization, operations, and permanent disability suffered by the claimant.
Subject
Insurance Law - Compensation for Personal Injury
Act Referred
Headnote
Insurance - Vehicular Accident - Compensation for Pain, Shock, and Suffering
Fact of the Case:
The appellant suffered grievous injuries in a vehicular accident and underwent hospitalization for more than three years. The Tribunal awarded medical bills but only Rs. 50,000 for pain, shock, and suffering, which was confirmed by the High Court.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the appellant's prolonged hospitalization, operations, and permanent disability warranted an enhancement of the compensation for pain, shock, and suffering. The court allowed the appeal and ordered an additional amount of Rs. 50,000 to be paid with interest by the Insurance Company.
Issues: Compensation for pain, shock, and suffering in a vehicular accident
Ratio Decidendi: The court enhanced the compensation based on the appellant's prolonged hospitalization, operations, and permanent disability, despite the absence of evidence of leg shortening.
Final Decision: The appeal was allowed, and an additional amount of Rs. 50,000 with interest was ordered to be paid by the Insurance Company. No costs were awarded.
Legal Category Hierarchy
Table of Contents
2. Appellant challenged the adequacy of the compensation awarded for pain, shock, and suffering. (Para 2 )
3. Prolonged hospitalization, multiple operations, and permanent disability indicate that the award for pain, shock, and suffering was on the lower side. (Para 2 )
4. Compensation for pain, shock, and suffering must be proportional to the severity of injuries, duration of treatment, and extent of permanent disability. (Para 2 )
5. Appeal allowed — Compensation for pain, shock, and suffering enhanced — Additional amount ordered with interest. (Para 3 , 4 )
6. What factors influence the determination of compensation for pain, shock, and suffering in accident claims?
The court evaluates the duration of hospitalization, the number of operations undergone, and the percentage of permanent disability to determine if the award is adequate. (Para 2 )
7. Can permanent disability be recognized without specific physical markers like limb shortening?
Yes, permanent disability can be awarded based on medical evidence even in the absence of specific physical indicators such as the shortening of a leg. (Para 2 )
8. From what date is interest typically calculated on enhanced compensation awards?
Interest on the additional compensation amount may be granted from the date of the filing of the claim petition until the date of payment. (Para 3 )
Judgment
MISRA, J.
( 1 ) LEAVE granted. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties appeal is heard finally.
( 2 ) THE appellant is the claimant. Respondent-Insurance Company is the real contesting party. Other respondents are served. On account of a vehicular accident the appellant suffered grievous injuries. He had to undergo hospitalisation for more than three years though intermittently. Medical bills of Rs. 1,11,611. 00 were fully awarded by the Tribunal. However, on pain, shock and suffering only Rs. 50,000. 00 were awarded. That award was confirmed by the High Court by the impugned judgment. In our view, on the peculiar facts of this case, as the appellant has suffered prologned period of hospitalisation and undergone operations and as the medical evidence showed that he had suffered permanent disability to the tune of 30 Per Cent though there was no evidence of shortening of leg, the award of Rs. 50,000. 00 on the head of pain, shock and suffering appears to us to be on lower side.
( 3 ) UNDER these circumstances, we deem it fit to enhance the award on that heard by Rs. 50,000. 00 more. With the result, the appeal will stand allowed to the extent of Rs. 50,000. 00 which will be additionally paid apart from the amount granted by the Tribunal and as confirmed by the High Court. This additional amount of Rs. 50,000. 00 shall be paid to the appellant with 12 Per Cent interest from the date of the claim petition till payment. The respondent-Insurance Company shall deposit this additional amount with interest in the Tribunal within eight weeks from today. The Tribunal will permit the appellant to withdraw the same towards full and final settlement of his claim in the present proceedings on due identification.
( 4 ) APPEAL is allowed accordingly to the aforesaid extent. No costs. Order accordingly.
