SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(SC) 671

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
National Insurance Company Limited
Versus
Jethu Ram
Decided on : July 22, 1998

The liability under Section 92-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, is independent of the liability under Section 110-A, and the insurer is not liable to pay compensation under Section 92-A if the insurer is not liable under the policy of insurance.

Headnote:

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1939 - SECTION 92-A, 92-B - INSURANCE - LIABILITY OF INSURER - NO FAULT LIABILITY - INTERPRETATION OF STATUTORY PROVISIONS - LIABILITY UNDER SECTION 92-A IS INDEPENDENT OF LIABILITY UNDER SECTION 110-A - INSURER NOT LIABLE TO PAY COMPENSATION UNDER SECTION 92-A IF NOT LIABLE UNDER POLICY OF INSURANCE.

Fact of the Case:

The insurer appealed against the High Court's judgment, which held that the insurer was liable to pay compensation under Section 92-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, even if the insurer was not liable under the policy of insurance.

Finding of the Court:

The Court held that the provisions of Sections 92-A and 92-B of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, do not impose liability on the insurer to pay compensation under Section 92-A if the insurer is not liable under the policy of insurance.

Issues: Whether the insurer is liable to pay compensation under Section 92-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, even if the insurer is not liable under the policy of insurance.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court interpreted Sections 92-A and 92-B of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, and held that the liability under Section 92-A is independent of the liability under Section 110-A. The Court further held that the insurer is not liable to pay compensation under Section 92-A if the insurer is not liable under the policy of insurance.

Final Decision: The Court allowed the appeals and held that the insurer was not liable to pay compensation under Section 92-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939.

Judgment

A. P. MISRA, J.

( 1 ) THESE appeals by the insurer are directed against the judgment of the Himachal Pradesh High court in an appeal under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939. The Motor Accidents Claims tribunal after perusing the materials produced before it came to the conclusion that under the policy of insurance the insurer is not liable to pay the compensation in question and finally had awarded compensation to the claimants to be recovered from the owner of the vehicle. But during the pendency of the proceeding by virtue of the statutory liability accruing under section 92-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 payments have been made by the insurer to the extent of Rs. 15,000. 00 in case of death and to the extent of Rs. 7,500. 00 in case of permanent disablement. Considering the question that whether for this amount insurer would be at all liable in view of the finding of the tribunal that the insurer has no liability under the policy of insurance to pay the compensation in question the tribunal came to hold that the said amount as provided under Ch. VII-A more particularly under section 92-A of the Motor Vehicles Act has to be borne by the insurer and the owner will not be liable to pay the said amount. In coming to the aforesaid conclusion the tribunal relied upon the provisions of clauses 3 (a) and (b) of section 92-B of the Act. Against the decision of the tribunal when the matter was carried in appeal to the High court, the High court by the impugned judgment came to hold that the liability arising under section 92-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 is independent of liability to pay compensation under section 110-A and, therefore, such liability arising out of section 92-A has to be borne by the insurer. Mr. Sharma, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant, contended that the provisions of S. 92-A and 92-B have been thoroughly misread by the tribunal as well as by the High court and under those provisions there is no liability on the insurer to pay the compensation accruing under the aforesaid provisions, once it is ultimately held that under the policy of insurance the insurer has no liability to pay the compensation in question. To appreciate the contention of the learned counsel it will be appropriate to extract the provisions of S. 92-A and 92-B of the Act:"92-A. Liability to pay compensation in certain cases on the principle of no fault.- (1 Where the death or permanent disablement of any person has resulted from an accident arising out of the use of a motor vehicle or motor vehicles, the owner of the vehicle shall, or, as the case may be, the owners of the vehicles shall, jointly and severally, be liable to pay compensation in respect of such death or disablement in accordance with the provisions of this section. (2 The amount of compensation which shall be payable under Ss. (1 in respect of the death of any person shall be a fixed sum of fifteen thousand rupees and the amount of compensation payable under that Ss. in respect of the permanent disablement of any person shall be a fixed sum of seven thousand five hundred rupees. (3 In any claim for compensation under Ss. (1, the claimant shall not be required to plead and establish that the death or permanent disablement in respect of which the claim has been made was due to any wrongful act, neglect or default of the owner or owners of the vehicle or vehicles concerned or of any other person. (4 A claim for compensation under 923 sub-section (1 shall not be defeated by reason of any wrongful act, neglect or default of the person in respect of whose death or permanent disablement the claim has been made nor shall the quantum of compensation recoverable in respect of such death or permanent disablement be reduced on the basis of the share of such person in the responsibility for such death or permanent disablement. 92-B. Provisions as to other right to claim compensation for death or permanent disablement.- (1 The right to claim compensation under section 92

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top