- The period for limitation to set aside a transfer of property made by the guardian of a ward who has attained majority is three years under Article 60 of the Limitation Act. (!) - There is a discussion on whether Article 65 or Article 60 applies depending on whether the suit seeks possession based on title or a declaration that the alienation was not for legal necessity; the judgment emphasizes Article 60 for setting aside such transfer. (!) (!) - The suit filed by the appellant contended there was no legal necessity for the alienation; the court held that the plaint should plead for a declaration that the alienation was bad in law, and possession would be a consequential relief, with Article 60 applying. (!) (!) - The defendants argued for Article 65 (twelve-year period) for possession based on title; the court did not accept this as applicable given the pleadings. (!) (!) - The civil appeal was dismissed; the period elapsed well beyond three years from attainment of majority. (!)

What is the period of limitation to set aside a transfer of property made by the guardian of a ward who has attained majority?

What is the appropriate Article of the Limitation Act applicable to a suit challenging alienation by a guardian where legal necessity is in question?

What constitutes the proper pleadings and relief (declaration that alienation is bad in law) in such a suit, and which Article governs the period of limitation for that relief?