SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(SC) 1117

K.T.THOMAS, S.B.MAJMUDAR
TODI INDUSTRIES LTD. – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


( 1 ) WE have heard learned counsel for the parties. The question involved is about the recovery of duty pursuant to the order dated 30-7-1984 passed by the Collector of Bombay. This order could have been made the subject- matter of an appeal under Section 128 of the Customs Act, 1962. Only on this short ground and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the controversy between the parties we decline to entertain this petition under article 136 of the Constitution of India and relegate the petitioner to the said remedy of an appeal. We make it clear that the observations of the High court while disposinng of the writ petition will not come in the way of either side in getting the matter decided before the competent appellate authority in accordance with law. In short all the legally permissible contentions will be open to both the sides for consideration of the appellate authority. As the time for filing the appeal by now has expired, we grant six weeks time to the petitioner to file the aforesaid statutory appeal.

( 2 ) IN view of the time granted to the petitioner to file statutory appeal, status quo regarding the recovery in question should be maintained for seven weeks.


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top