SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(SC) 10

S.M.SIKRI, J.C.SHAH, M.HIDAYATULLAH, P.B.GAJENDRAGADKAR, R.S.BACHAWAT
MCKENZIES LTD. – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent


Judgment

SIKRI, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal by special leave directed against the judgment of the Bombay High Court in a reference made to it under section 34 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953. One of the questions referred to the High Court was " whether the transaction referred to in bill dated 29th June, 1955, is liable to sales tax under the Bombay sales Tax Act, 1953. "

( 2 ) THE appellant, M/s. Mckenzies Limited (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), who are engaged in the business of body-building on motor chassis, entered into a contract for the construction of 218 bodies with the Government of India. The price agreed upon was rs. 1,730 per body. In pursuance of this contract, the appellant presented a bill for five bodies supplied by them on June 29, 1956, for rs. 8,650. Under section 27 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953, the appellant applied to the Collector for the determination of the follow- ing three questions:" (i) Whether they are dealers within the meaning of that word given in section 2 (6) in relation to their activities as a body-building contractor ? (2) Whether body-building contracts constitute sales ? (3) If so, whether the receipts from body-building cont










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top