A.V.VARADARAJAN, RANGANATH MISRA, SYED M.FAZAL ALI
State Of Punjab – Appellant
Versus
MOHINDER SINGH – Respondent
( 1 ) ORDER :- Heard counsel for the parties. We find no merit in this appeal so far as quantum of compensation is concerned, because special leave petition has been dismissed against the impugned judgment. However, the respondents are entitled to the benefit of the provisions of Act 68 of 1984 by which 30 Per Cent solatium is to be given from the date of publication to the date of notification under S. 4, sub-section (1) of the Act, and interest at the rate of 9 Per Cent instead of 6 Per Cent , as originally contained in the unamended Act, from the date of taking possession of the land acquired. Since the decision in this case has been given after one year, it is manifest that under the said Act, respondents would be entitled to interest at the rate of 9 Per Cent towards which they have already got 6 Per Cent.
( 2 ) WITH the above observation, we dismiss the appeal. Order accordingly.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.