SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(SC) 70

S.NATARAJAN, SABYASACHI MUKHARJEE
Commissioner Of Income Tax – Appellant
Versus
Mussadilal Ram Bharose – Respondent


JUDGMENT

SABYASACHI MUKHARJI, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal arises out of the decision of the Allahabad High Court dated 24-9-1971. The High Court by the order impugned dismissed an application under S. 256 (2) Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called the act ). The assesses, a firm of two partners was at the relevant time a licenced vendor of country liquor. For the assessment year 1965-66, the Income-tax Officer rejected its account book on the ground that sales and expenses were not verified and the margin of profit shown was low. It may not be inappropriate in view of the contentions urged before us to refer to the order of the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner for the assessment year 1965-66 under S. 27 1 (1) (c) read with S. 274 (2) of the Act.

( 2 ) FOR the assessment year 1965-66, the Income-tax Officer, as noted by the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner, rejected the book result showing sales of country liquor at Rs. 5,82,234. 00 and the profit margin at 4 Per Cent for lack of verifiability of sales and expenses and low margin of profit. The Income-tax Officer estimated the sales at Rs. 7,60,000. 00 being Rs. 6,50,000. 00 in Lakhibagh shop and Rs. 1,10,000. 00 in Magra shop, and adopt
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top