SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(SC) 68

V.RAMASWAMI, C.A.VAIDIALINGAM, J.C.SHAH, K.SUBBA RAO, S.M.SIKRI
J. KRISHAN KUMAR NARULA – Appellant
Versus
State Of J & K – Respondent


Judgment

SUBBA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THESE two appeals arise out of a common judgment of a Division Bench of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir dismissing the two petitions filed by the appellants for the issuance of a writ quashing the order passed by the Taxing and Excise Officer, Jammu, refusing to renew their licences for the year 1966-67 in respect of their liquor shop.

( 2 ) THE facts giving rise to these two appeals may be briefly and separately stated.

( 3 ) CIVIL Appeal No. 65 of 1967 relates to Glory Restaurant situated in Moti Bazar, Jammu. The appellant in the said appeal, who is the proprietor of the said restaurant, after taking the requisite licence from the Government, had been carrying on for the last 7 years the business of retail sale of country and foreign liquor in the said restaurant. The licence was an annual licence and it was being renewed from year to year. On 11/12/1965, the Deputy Excise and Taxation Commissioner, Jammu, issued a notice to the appellant ordering the shifting of the premises of the said restaurant to some other locality on the ground that the inhabitants of the locality had complained against the location of the appellants bar and restaurant there

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top