SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(SC) 154

M.M.PUNCHHI, RANGANATH MISRA, S.C.AGRAWAL
UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
D. C. M. LTD. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

PUNCHHI, J.

( 1 ) SPECIAL leave granted.

( 2 ) THESE two appeals respectively are directed by the Union of India and the Delhi Development Authority (hereinafter referred to as the DDA) against the full bench decision and order of the Delhi High court dated 22/05/1987 declaring and by necessary implication directing that the DDA carry out and implement its Resolution No. 26 dated 1/02/1983, which resolution was said to have been substituted by it by a later Resolution No. 3 dated 1/08/1986 reiterated by another resolution dated 3/11/1986. These resolutions related to some affairs of the Delhi Cloth Mills Limited (hereinafter referred to as the DCM), the writ petitioner before the High court, and the official reaction thereon.

( 3 ) SOME of the essential facts as culled out from the judgment of the High court, and others which have come by in the meantime, would be necessary to be noticed. The Mill has a complex over an area of about 63 acres at sites at Bara Hindu Rao and Kishan Ganj at Delhi. The Delhi Development Act, 1956 envisages preparation by the DDA of a Master Plan for Delhi, which it did, and was enforced and one of its attributes is to assign land use. Bara Hindu







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top