SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(SC) 528

K.RAMASWAMY, M.M.PUNCHHI, A.M.AHMADI
SATINDER SINGH ARORA – Appellant
Versus
STATE BANK OF PATIALA – Respondent


( 1 ) THE petitioner joined service of the State Bank of Patiala as a Clerk in 1968 and was promoted to the post of Trainee Officer with effect from 1/08/1974. By letter No. Staff/genl/3749 dated 1/08/1974 the petitioner was informed that the Banks Board of Directors had approved his promotion as Trainee Officer under Group B Grade II with effect from 1/08/1974 in the scale of Rs. 500. 00-1,030. 00. By a subsequent letter dated 14/08/1975 he was informed that the Board of Directors had confirmed him as Officer Grade II with effect from 1/08/1975 in the said scale. When the petitioner was working as Branch Manager at Birhana Road, Kanpur, he is alleged to have committed some misdemeanour. By a letter dated 9/01/1980 he was called upon to explain the purchase bills in excess of his discretionary power of Rs. 1 lakh. The petitioner sent his reply to the said memorandum on 31/01/1980 contending that the purchase of the bills was within his discretionary limit. The petitioner was, thereafter, placed under suspension and was served with a charge-sheet. The Regional Manager of the Bank was appointed as Enquiry Officer to enquire into the alleged misconduct of the petitioner. The petitione








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top