SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(SC) 309

M.M.PUNCHHI, S.P.BHARUCHA
SHANKER MOTIRAM NALE – Appellant
Versus
SHIOLALSING GANNUSING RAJPUT – Respondent


( 1 ) ). This appeal is obviously incompetent. It is against an order of a division bench of the High court rejecting the application for review of a judgment and decree passed by a learned Single Judge, who seems to have retired in the meantime. It is not against the basic judgment. Order 47 Rule 7 of Civil Procedure Code bars an appeal against the order of the court rejecting the review. On this basis, we reject the appeal. No costs. I. A. No. 1/93 (Application for substitution)

( 2 ) ). No orders are necessary in view of the rejection of the appeal.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top