SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1969 Supreme(SC) 466

V.RAMASWAMI, I.D.DUA
State of A. P. – Appellant
Versus
I. B. S. PRASADA RAO – Respondent


Judgment

RAMASWAMI,, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is brought by special leave from the judg-ment of the Andhra Pradesh High court, dated 23/03/1967 in Criminalappeal Nos. 297, 298, 299 and 300 of 1965 preferred by Respondents 1 to4 whereby the High court allowed the said appeals, set aside the judgmentof the Sessions court and convicted the respondents.

( 2 ) IN the Co-operative central Bank, Srikakulam, accused No. 1satya Rao, and accused No. 2 Prasada Rao were working as clerks whileaccused No. 4 Mohan Rao was a peon. The Co-operative central Bankhas four branches one of which is at Sompeta. The branch office has amanager, a clerk, a shroff and one peon and a night-watcher. Till Septem-ber 30, 1964 Sri V. S. Venkateswarlu was the Branch Manager of the Bankat Sompeta. He went on leave with effect from 1/10/1964. In his placeaccused No. 1 was posted to act as Branch Manager, Sompeta. Accusedno. 1 took charge as Branch Manager with effect from 1/10/1964 fromvenkateswarlu. The case of the prosecution is that while accused No. 1was at the headquarters he came to know that the accused No. 4 was in thehabit of practising signatures of the secretary of the Bank. A conspiracy forcheating the bank w






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top