SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(SC) 95

K.S.HEGDE, A.N.GROVER, J.C.SHAH
A. P. State Road Transport Corporation, Hyderabad – Appellant
Versus
K VENKATARAMIREDDY – Respondent


Judgment

GROVER,, J.

( 1 ) THESE two appeals have been filed by special leave against a common judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High court.

( 2 ) THE appellant is a State Transport Undertaking within the meaning of Ch. IV of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, hereinafter called the "act". It applied to the Regional Transport Authority, Warangal, for grant of temporary permits under S. 62 of the Act on the route Thorrur to hyderabad via Kodakondla, Thirumalagiri and Jangaon. A portion of the said route between Jangaon and Thirumalagiri is a part of the notified route and another portion of the route between Jangaon and Hyderabad is also a part of the notified route. All other operators were excluded from operating on the notified routes. Respondent 1 and 2 who are private operator? plying stage carriages on the route Valigonda to Thorrur filed Writ Petition in the High court. According to them the appellant was not entitled to the grant of temporary permits. By a common judgment, dated 1/11/1966, the learned Single Judge dismissed those petitions. It was held, inter alia, that neither individual nor personal rights of the writ petitioners had been affected. The learned Judge, however, observ



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top