SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(SC) 282

Supreme Court Of India
USMAN
Versus
State of Andhara Pradesh
Decided On : April 29, 1971

Headnote:

Andhra Pradesh Registration Subordinate Service Special Rules – Rule 5 – Constitution of India, 1950 – Articles 14, 226 – Recruitment – Violation of Article 14 – Principal question that arises for decision in this appeal by certificate is as to the vires of Rule 5 of the Andhra Pradesh Registration Subordinate Service Special Rules – High Court has struck down this rule on the ground that it is violative of Article 14 of the Constitution. – As a result of that conclusion, it has also quashed the recruitrnent of some of the respondents made in March, 1965 for being posted as Sub-Registrars Grade II. – Whether Rule 5 of the Rules is ultra vires Article 14 of the Constitution – Whether the recruitments made are not in accordance with the rules – Held, Court do not think that in the present case the State can be said to have treated unequals as equals. – Rule of equality is intended to advance justice by avoiding discrimination. – High Court by overlooking the reason behind Rule 5 came to the erroneous conclusion that the said rule violated Article 14 of the constitution. – Selection was made on the basis of seniority-cum-merit; the seniors among the clerks were selected subject to suitability. – Those persons who were entitled to be given preference under the rules were considered separately and recruited at the first instance. – Only thereafter the other recruitment were made. – Rules do not prescribe that the recruitment should be made on the basis of merit and merit alone. – Bearing in mind the fact that the recruitment with which court is concerned in this case is a recruitment by transfer which means recruitment from among the ministerial officials method adopted by the Registrar appears to court to be the most reasonable one – Appeal Allowed

Judgment

HEGDE, J.

( 1 ) , J. : - The principal question that arises for decision in this appeal by certificate is as to the vires of Rule 5 of the Andhra Pradesh Registration Subordinate Service Special Rules, to be hereinafter referred as "the rules". The High Court has struck down this rule on the ground that it is violative of Article 14 of the Constitution. As a result of that conclusion, it has also quashed the recruitrnent of some of the respondents made in March, 1965 for being posted as Sub-Registrars Grade II.

( 2 ) THE petitioners as well as respondent No. 3 onwards in the Writ Petition were serving as clerks either in the upper division or in the lower division in the Registration and Stamps Department including the office of the Registrar General of Births, Deaths and Marriages and the Office of the Registrar of the Firms. Some of the respondents had been recruited by the Inspector General of Registration and Stamps, Andhra Pradesh for being appointed as Sub-Registrars. The petitioners challenged the validity of their recruitment on various grounds, by means of a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. But that petition was summarily dismissed by a single Judge of the Andhra Pradesh High Court. There after, the matter was taken up in appeal to a Division Bench of that Court. The Division Bench rejected all the contentions of the petitioners except one viz, that rule 5 of the Rules is ultra vires Article 14 of the Constitution. As a result of that conclusion it struck down the impugned recruitments. Only two questions were presented before us for decision viz (I) whether Rule 5 of the Rules is ultra vires Article 14 of the Constitution, and (II) whether the recruitments made are not in accordance with the rules. AT this stage, it may be mentioned that the High Court has held that the impugned recruitments were made in accordance with the rules. In other words, the second question was decided against the petitioners.

( 3 ) WE shall first take up the question as to the vires of Rule 5. The rules provide for the promotion to the posts of Sub-Registrars as well as for recruitment to those posts. Rule 2 provides that a post of Grade I Sub-Registrar should be filled up by promotion from Grade II Sub-Registrar. So far as Grade II Sub-Registrars are concerned, they are to be appointed either by promotion from reserve Sub-Registrars or by "recruitment by transfer from the clerks of the Registration an stamps Department including the Office of the Registrar General of Births, Deaths and Marriages and the Office of the Registrar of the Firms. " Rule 5 deals with qualifications for being recruited as Grade II Sub-Registrars. That rule reads:"qualifications:- No person shall eligible for appointment to the category mentioned below unless he possesses the qualifications shown. CATEGORY and Qualifications. 1. Sub-Registrars, II Grade :- (i) Must be a permanent clerk and must have served for a period of not less than seven years on duty as clerk in the Registration an Stamps Department including the office of the Registrar-General of Births, Deaths and Marriages and the Office, of the Registrar of Firms: (II) Must have passed the Registration Test, and (III) (1) Must have taken at the final examination at the end of his school or college course, one of the following languages, namely:-TELUGU, Hindi, Oriya, Kannada, Tamil, Urdu or Marathi, or (2) Must have passed the Government Translation Test or the Second Class Language Test - Full Test. (IV) Must have passed the second class language Test - Full Test - In a language other than that taken for S. S. L. C. or University. preference shall be given to persons who, in addition to the qualifications specified in items (i) to (iii) possess a Degree in Law of a University in the State or any other equivalent qualification or a Leadership certificate in the First Grade or who have put in five years service in the category of Upper Division Clerks in the Registration Department






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top