SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(SC) 185

M.N.VENKATACHALIAH, S.MOHAN
POWER CONTROL APPLIANCES – Appellant
Versus
SUMEET MACHINES Private LTD. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

MOHAN, J.

( 1 ) ALL these appeals can be dealt with under a common judgment. The Civil Nos. 255,1-52 of 1993 are by the first plaintiff while Civil No. 2553 of 1993 by the second plaintiff.

( 2 ) THE plaintiffs filed three suits on the file of the High court of Madras (i) C. S. No. 343 of 1992 complaining of infringement of the copyright of the first plaintiff (Power Control and Appliances Company); (ii) C. S. No. 431 of 1992 alleging the violation of the registered trade mark sumeet No. 263836 in Part-A in Class 7 for machines (electric) for kitchen use; (iii) C. S. No. 432 of 1992 claiming the design registeration in the whipper Blade of the power operated mixies.

( 3 ) PENDING these suits, four application Nos. 226, 227, 271 and 272 of 1992 were taken out, two in C. S. No. 343 of 1992 and one each in C. S. Nos. 431 and 432 of 1992 respectively.

( 4 ) THE facts are common to all the suits and the applications. In C. S. No. 343 of 1992 in the Application Nos. 226 and 227 of 1992, the plaintiffs prayed for an interim injunction to restrain the respondents (defendants) from using, distributing, printing or causing to be printed the work as contained in Document Nos. (1 receip








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top