SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 294

B.L.HANSARIA, K.RAMASWAMY
Amar Singh – Appellant
Versus
LAL SINGH – Respondent


( 1 ) ). This appeal by special leave arises from the order of the Punjab and haryana High court made in SA No. 185 of 1966 on 18/1/1977. Pending appeal, the first respondent died on 5/5/1979 and the appeal against him stood abated. We are informed that the third respondent also died on 8-11- 1984. No steps have been taken. We are further informed that all the appellants too have died but legal representatives have not been brought on record. We need not proceed further except to the extent of the matter on record, namely, the death of the first respondent and abatement qua him. Admittedly, the first respondent died on 5/5/1979. His defence against the suit of the appellant is based upon the Will. The Will now stands upheld by the High court. Consequently, as all the respondents are jointly entitled to the property covered under the Will, the relief is joint and inseparable. Since the appeal as against the first respondent stood abated, the decree being joint and inseparable, the appeal stands abated as against all the respondents. Consequently, we cannot hear the matter on merits, though Ms Janani, learned counsel for the appellant, sought to canvass the correctness of the finding

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top