SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 294

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Amar Singh
VERSUS
LAL SINGH
DECIDED ON: February 7, 1996

Abatement of appeal due to the death of a party and joint and inseparable nature of relief sought.

Headnote:

Abatement - Will - The court found that the appeal stood abated as the first respondent had died, and the Will, which was the basis of the first respondent's defense, had been upheld by the High court. The relief being joint and inseparable, the appeal stood abated as against all the respondents.

Fact of the Case:

The first respondent and the third respondent had died, and the legal representatives of the appellants had not been brought on record. The first respondent's defense was based on a Will, which had been upheld by the High court.

Finding of the Court:

The court dismissed the appeal as it stood abated due to the death of the first respondent and the joint and inseparable nature of the relief sought.

Issues: Abatement of appeal due to the death of the first respondent, joint and inseparable nature of the relief sought, correctness of the finding of the High court.

Ratio Decidendi: The appeal stood abated as the first respondent had died, and the relief sought was joint and inseparable, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed with no costs.

( 1 ) ). This appeal by special leave arises from the order of the Punjab and haryana High court made in SA No. 185 of 1966 on 18/1/1977. Pending appeal, the first respondent died on 5/5/1979 and the appeal against him stood abated. We are informed that the third respondent also died on 8-11- 1984. No steps have been taken. We are further informed that all the appellants too have died but legal representatives have not been brought on record. We need not proceed further except to the extent of the matter on record, namely, the death of the first respondent and abatement qua him. Admittedly, the first respondent died on 5/5/1979. His defence against the suit of the appellant is based upon the Will. The Will now stands upheld by the High court. Consequently, as all the respondents are jointly entitled to the property covered under the Will, the relief is joint and inseparable. Since the appeal as against the first respondent stood abated, the decree being joint and inseparable, the appeal stands abated as against all the respondents. Consequently, we cannot hear the matter on merits, though Ms Janani, learned counsel for the appellant, sought to canvass the correctness of the finding of the High court.

( 2 ) ). The appeal is dismissed. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top