SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 1634

G.B.PATTANAIK, K.RAMASWAMY
KISHORE – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent


( 1 ) ). The petitioner was appointed on temporary basis dehors the rules as medical Officer in Class III post on 28/2/1990 for a period of three months and it was extended from time to time. Apprehending termination of his service, he filed Writ Petition No. 2661 of 1990 in the High court of bombay at Nagpur. The High court had transferred the matter to the administrative tribunal. In TA No. 3559 of 1992, the tribunal by order dated 15/9/1993 directed that the petitioner may be allowed to continue until the duly selected candidates by the Selection Board or Maharashtra Public service Commission were available and appointed; his continuance in service was only on ad hoc basis without conferment of any right including the requirement of notice before terminating the service; at best, he would be entitled to be considered along with other candidates and as soon as the duly selected candidate is appointed, his service was liable to be terminated even without notice. By proceedings dated 4/1/1994 one Dr S. S. Solanki, Medical officer, Class III who was selected by the public service commission was posted by transfer at his request in place of the petitioner. The petitioner has challeng


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top