SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(SC) 310

P.N.SHINGHAL, Y.V.CHANDRACHUD, P.K.GOSWAMI
BALDEV RAJ GULIANI – Appellant
Versus
PUNJAB And HARYANA HIGH court – Respondent


Judgment

GOSWAMI, J.

( 1 ) THESE two appeals are by certificate from the judgment of the Full Bench of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana. Both the appeals question the decision of the High Court - one by the Judicial Officer and the other by the State Government.

( 2 ) THE appellant in Civil Appeal No. 908 of 1975 (hereinafter to be referred to as the officer) was originally a member of the Punjab Civil Service (Judicial Branch ). He was appointed as a Subordinate Judge, IV Class, on 27/02/1956. Thereafter he was promoted as a Sub-Judge, First Class, and was duly confirmed. While, as a Subordinate Judge-cum- Magistrate First Class in Amloh, District Patiala, the Bar Association of Amloh on 11/05/1965, sent a resolution to the High Court levelling certain charges against the officer affecting his integrity and impartiality. The High Court ascertained the facts through a preliminary enquiry held by the District Judge, apparently, ex parte, at this stage. Thereafter, on the report of the District Judge a regular departmental enquiry was instituted. The officer was suspended by the Government on 6/06/1966, at the instance of the High Court. The District judge, Sangrur, was appointed a








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top