P.K.GOSWAMI, P.N.SHINGHAL, Y.V.CHANDRACHUD
SHAFIQUDDIN – Appellant
Versus
PYARELAL – Respondent
Judgment
CHANDRACHUD
( 1 ) MR. Mishra on behalf of the appellants has raised in this appeal the question whether a lease of immovable property from year to year or reserving a yearly rent requires registration and whether if such a lease is not registered, It can confer any legal right or title on the so-called leases. Apart from the fact that this question is settled by a long course of decisions, it appears to us that the question does not properly arise on the facts of the case.
( 2 ) UNDER a resolution passed by the Municipal Board of Budaun which is respondent 3 of this appeal, respondents 1 and 2 were put in possession of an open plot of land. They were entitled under the terms of the resolution to put up at their own cost a construction on the land but such construction was to belong to respondent 3 on the determination of the lease. Respondents 1 and 2 took appellant 2, who is the father of appellant 1, as a partner in the business which was being conducted by them in the shops constructed by them on the leasehold property. On the dissolution of the partnership, respondents 1 and 2 called upon the appellants to vacate the partnership premises, whereupon the appellants contend
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.