SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(SC) 356

A.P.SEN, E.S.VENKATARAMIAH, P.N.BHAGWATI
ASSESSING AUTHORITY CUM EXCISE AND TAXATION OFFICER,gurgaon – Appellant
Versus
EAST INDIA COTTON MFC. company LTD. FARIDABAD – Respondent


Judgment

BHAGWATI

( 1 ) THIS appeal by special leave raises a short but interesting question of construction of Section 8 (3) (b) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The determination of this question has given rise to divergence of opinion amongst different High Courts but if we have regard to the well recognised canons of construction of taxing statutes and also focus our attention on the object and intendment of the section, we do not think it presents much difficulty of solution. The facts giving rise to the appeal are few and may be briefly stated as follows.

( 2 ) THE assessee is a limited company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and having its registered office at Calcutta. The assessee owns a factory in Faridabad, where it carries on business of manufacturing and processing textiles. The assessee is registered under the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948 as in force in the State of Haryana and at all material times it also held a certificate of Registration under Section 7 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the Central Act ). The business mentioned in the Certificate of Registration was "textile manufacturing, sale, purchase, whole-sale dis





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top