SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(SC) 220

A.N.SEN, A.V.VARADARAJAN, SYED M.FAZAL ALI
S. MUNISHAMAPPA – Appellant
Versus
B. VENKATARAYAPPA – Respondent


Judgment

AMRENDRA NATH SEN

( 1 ) THIS judgment will dispose of both the appeals which arise out of the judgment and order passed by the High Court of Karnataka on the 7th of August, 1979 in art Election Petition filed by B. Venkatarayyappa who was a candidate for election to the Karnataka State Legislative Assembly from Sidlaghatta Assembly Constituency in the General Election held in 1978 and was defeated at the said election by S. Munishamappa, the Respondent No. 5 in the said petition who was declared elected. T. A. Kempegodwa, Respondent No. 2, Narayanappa, Respondent No. 3, and G. Papanna the Respondent No. 4 in the Election Petition. were the other candidates who had also contested the said election and had been defeated. In the said Election Petition filed by Venkatarayappa under Section 81 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), the Petitioner had prayed for a declaration that the election of Munishamappa was void under Section 9a of the Act and also for a declaration under Section 100 of the Act that the Petitioner had been duly elected to the Assembly from the said Constituency.

( 2 ) FOR reasons recorded in the judgment, the lear



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top