SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(SC) 92

A.K.SARKAR, B.P.SINHA, J.L.KAPUR, K.C.DAS GUPTA, S.R.DASS, T.L.VENKATARAMA AYYAR
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
T. R. Varna – Respondent


Judgment

VENKATARAMA AIYAR

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal by special leave against the judgment and order of the High Court of Punjab in an application under Art. 226 of the Constitution setting aside an order dated 16/09/1954, dismissing the respondent herein, from Government service on the ground that it was in contravention of Art. 311 (2) of the Constitution.

( 2 ) THE respondent was, at the material dates, an Assistant Controller in the Commerce Department of the Union Government. Sometime in the middle of March, 1953, one Shri Bhan, a representative of a Calcutta firm styled Messrs. Gattulal Chhaganlal Joshi came to Delhi with a view to get the name of the firm removed from black list in which it had been placed, and for that purpose, he was contacting the officers in the Department.

INFORMATION was given to Sri Tawakley an assistant in the Ministry of Commerce and Industry (Complaints Branch), that Sri Bhan was offering to give bribe for getting an order in his favour. He immediately reported the matter to the special Police Establishment and they decided to lay a trap for him. Sri Bhan, however, was willing to pay the bribe only after order in his favour had been made and communicat













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top