Supreme Court Of India
KRISHNA KUMAR
Versus
MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE
Decided On : February 21, 1957
MUNICIPAL BYE-LAWS - REGULATION OF MARKET - ISSUANCE OF RECEIPTS AND PASSES - RIGHT OF ADATYA TO CARRY ON BUSINESS - FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS - ARTICLE 19 (1) (G) AND ARTICLE 14 OF THE CONSTITUTION - CENTRAL PROVINCES AND BERAR MUNICIPALITIES ACT (ACT 2 OF 1922), SECTIONS 178 (3), 179 - BYE-LAWS 5 (A), 6, 7.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, an Adatya (commission agent) of sellers of grain, challenged the resolution passed by the Municipality prohibiting the issuance of Ganj receipts to Adatyas, alleging violation of his fundamental rights under Articles 19 (1) (g) and 14 of the Constitution.
Finding of the Court:
The Court held that the impugned resolution did not violate the petitioner's fundamental rights as it was a reasonable restriction on his occupation as an Adatya of a seller of grain, considering the purpose of the market and the protection provided to sellers by the bye-laws.
Issues: 1. Whether the Municipality's resolution prohibiting the issuance of Ganj receipts to Adatyas violated the petitioner's fundamental right to carry on his occupation under Article 19 (1) (g) of the Constitution? 2. Whether the resolution amounted to discrimination against the petitioner in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The bye-laws of the Municipality did not constitute a general prohibition against the petitioner carrying on his business as an Adatya. 2. The resolution merely prohibited the issuance of Ganj receipts in the name of Adatyas, who were not the owners of the grain sold. 3. This restriction was reasonable considering the purpose of the market and the protection provided to sellers by the bye-laws.
Final Decision: The petition was dismissed with costs.
Judgment
SYED JAFER IMAM, J.
( 1 ) THIS is an application under Article 32 of the Constitution against the Municipal Committee of Bhatapara (hereinafter referred to as "the Municipality") alleging that the petitioners fundamental rights guaranteed by Article 19 (1) (g) and Article 14 of the Constitution have been violated by the action of the Municipality.
( 2 ) IN Bhatapara there is a market vested in the Municipality known as "ganj" the use of which is regulated by its bye-laws framed under Section 179 of the Central Provinces and Berar Municipalities Act (Act 2 of 1922) (hereinafter referred to as the Act ). At this market transactions of sale and purchase of grain take place. According to the petitioner, he is an Adatya by occupation and carries on his trade as such for sellers of grain in the said market. He has been prevented from carrying on his trade as an Adatya of sellers of grain in the said market by the Municipality in pursuance of a resolution passed by it on 4-9-1949. The employees of the Municipality have been directed under the resolution to stop issuing Ganj receipts to the petitioner. Consequently, the petitioner is unable to enter the market and do his business as an Adatya of sellers of grain. It is further alleged that while the petitioner is being treated in this fashion by the Municipality other adatyas of sellers of grain are permitted to carry on such business in the market. There has thus been discrimination on the part of the Municipality.
( 3 ) IN 1935, the Government of the Central Provinces published a notification confirming the bye-laws framed by the Municipality. These bye-laws contained provisions for regulating the use of the market at bhatapara. Three of those are in the following terms:
"5. (a) Any person other than officers of the Government, members and officers of the Municipal Committee, bona fide purchasers and their adhatias, agents and servants, bona fide sellers of grain, licensed brokers, measurers, weighmen and hamals entering the Ganj otherwise than on business may be ejected by the Ganj Daroga or Moharrir. (b) Any person found drunk or disorderly or creating a disturbance in the Ganj shall be immediately ejected by the Ganj Daroga or Moharrir.
6. No person shall enter or attempt to enter the Ganj when directed not to do so by an authorised municipal servant or disobey the instructions.
7. A merchant shall do business in the Ganj either in person or by agent or through a licensed broker duly empowered by him in writing. Every transaction shall be entered by the Moharrir in the register prescribed by the notified Area Committee for the purpose. "
( 4 ) IN 1948, the Municipality passed the following resolution:
"the Committee unanimously resolves that on account of traders doing commission agency business in the Municipal Ganj, appreciable facilities have resulted to village cartmen in disposing of their goods and in securing proper measurement and obtaining ready payments after measurement. Hence in order to have control and supervision over the arhat system, the following amendment to be made in the Ganj bye-laws and approval of the Provincial Government to the same be obtained. "the bye-law proposed by this resolution stated:
"14-B. The Municipal Committee shall appoint licensed Adhatias (commission agents) in the Ganj who will help the sellers in prompt disposal of their grains and shall make payment to them of their grains immediately after its measurement. "the proposed bye-law could not take effect until it had been confirmed by the State Government under Section 178 (3) of the Act. The State Government did not confirm the bye-law but required the Municipality to submit a statement of Objects and Reasons for the proposed amendment of its bye- laws. Thereafter, the Municipality considered the communication of the government and passed the following resolution on 4-9-1949: "now the Committee does not desire to adopt the system of arhatiyas in its Ganj. The subject is therefore dro
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.