SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(SC) 267

RAGHUBAR DAYAL, J.R.MUDHOLKAR, K.SUBBA RAO
JOGINDER SINGH – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Custodian General of Evacuee Property – Respondent


Judgment

MUDHOLKAR

( 1 ) IN this appeal under Art. 133 (1) (c) of the Constitution the question which arises for consideration is whether after 22/07/1952 the Custodian of Evacuee Property in the State of Punjab or the Custodian-General healing an appeal from an order made by the Custodian after 22/07/1952 has the power to cancel an allotment of rural evacuee property on a quasi-permanent basis except upon the grounds set out in R. 14 (6) of the Administration a of Evacuee Property Rules, 1950 as amended by notification No. S. R. O. 1290, dated 22/07/1952.

( 2 ) THE circumstances under which this question arises may now be briefly stated. The appellants and their father Nand Singh were displaced persons from West Pakistan and got allotment of some land in the village Raikot, District Ludhiana on a temporary basis. Later, each of the appellants 1 to 3 was allotted 8standard acres of land on a quasi-permanent basis while Nand Singh, their father who was entitled to 41 standard acres and 7 units and to whom land to that extent had been temporarily allotted in the village Raikot was allotted the same acreage of land in the village Hambran which is situate at a distance of 25 or 30 miles


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top