SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(SC) 283

J.M.SHELAT, K.SUBBA RAO, M.HIDAYATULLAH, R.S.BACHAWAT, S.M.SIKRI
Lala Ram – Appellant
Versus
Supreme court of India – Respondent


Judgment

SUBBA RAO

( 1 ) IN this petition the question of the constitutional validity of Order XL, R. 2 (2) of the Supreme Court Rules, 1966, hereinafter called the Rules, is raised.

( 2 ) THE petitioner filed a special leave petition against the judgment and decree of the High Court of Punjab passed in a Letters Patent Appeal. On 14/01/1964, this Court granted special leave. Thereafter, the petitioner deposited the amount of security and some money as advance towards printing charges. But, as he failed to file the list of documents, on 2/04/1965, special leave granted to him was rescinded and the special leave petition was dismissed for non-prosecution. Then the petitioner filed a writ petition being Writ Petition No. 85 of 1966 in this Court under Art. 32 of the Constitution on the ground that the said order of revocation of the special leave granted and the dismissal of his special leave petition deprived him of his right to appeal and that the said order offended Art. 14 of the Constitution. On 24/03/1966, this Court dismissed that writ petition. On 15/04/1966, the petitioner filed the present petition for reviewing the order of this Court in Writ Petition No. 85 of 1966 dated 24












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top