SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(SC) 65

K.SUBBA RAO, V.RAMASWAMI
DURGACHARAN NAIK – Appellant
Versus
State Of Orissa – Respondent


Judgment

RAMASWAMI

( 1 ) THIS appeal is brought, by special leave, from the judgment of the Orissa High Court, dated 2/03/1964 in Government Appeal No. 49 of 1963 by which the High Court set aside the order of acquittal passed by the Assistant Sessions Judge of Puri and convicted the appellants under S. 353 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced them to 4 months rigorous imprisonment.

( 2 ) THE decree-holders Panu Sahu and Naba Sahu levied execution of the decree (Ex. Case No. 125/62), in the Court of the Munsif, Puri, against the appellants and a writ of attachment of the moveables of the judgment-debtor was issued for execution through Prosecution witness 2, Sadhu Charan Mohanty, a peon of the Civil Court, Puri, returnable by 10/08/1962. Prosecution witness 2 reached the village of the judgment-debtors on 10/08/1962 at 10 a. m. with the warrant of attachment and asked the judgment-debtors to pay the decretal dues of Rs. 952. 10 np. , and when he was going to seize some of the movables, the appellants came there with lathis and resisted him. Prosecution witness 2 sent a report-Ex. 4-to the Court through Nabaghan requesting the Court to give necessary police help. Accordingly on the









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top