Supreme Court Of India
STATE OF GUJARAT
Versus
SAKARWALA BROTHERS
Decided On : September 27, 1966
SALES TAX - SUGAR - DEFINITION - WHETHER PATASA, HARDA AND ALCHIDANA ARE FORMS OF SUGAR - BOMBAY SALES TAX ACT, 1959 (51 OF 1959), SCHEDULE A, ENTRY 47 - CENTRAL EXCISES AND SALT ACT, 1944 (1 OF 1944), FIRST SCHEDULE, ITEM 8.
Fact of the Case:
The opponents, registered dealers dealing in patasa, harda, and alchidana, requested the Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax to determine if any tax was payable on the sales of these items. The Deputy Commissioner held that the sale of bura sugar was exempt under entry 47 of Schedule A to the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, while the sales of other articles were covered by entry 22 of Schedule E and were taxable. The Commissioner of Sales Tax revised the order, holding that the other articles were covered by entry 31 of Schedule C. The Sales Tax Tribunal held that patasa, harda, and alchidana should be treated as forms of sugar and were exempt under entry 47 of Schedule A. The State of Gujarat referred the matter to the High Court for determination of whether these sales were exempt under entry 47 of Schedule A or covered by entry 31 of Schedule C or entry 22 of Schedule E.
Finding of the Court:
The High Court held that the sales of patasa, harda, and alchidana were exempt from tax under entry 47 of Schedule A to the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, as they were forms of sugar containing more than 90% sucrose, as defined in item 8 of the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944.
Issues: Whether the sales of patasa, harda, and alchidana are exempt from tax under entry 47 of Schedule A to the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, as forms of sugar containing more than 90% sucrose.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court interpreted the term "sugar" in entry 47 of Schedule A to the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, in light of the definition provided in item 8 of the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. It held that the term "sugar" in entry 47 was intended to cover all forms of sugar, regardless of their shape, texture, color, or density, provided they contained more than 90% sucrose. The Court rejected the argument that the term referred only to sugar in its commonly understood form, as the Legislature had used the phrase "any form of sugar" instead of "any variety of sugar". The Court also distinguished the case from precedents involving the interpretation of revenue laws in a commercial sense, as the facts in this case were different.
Final Decision: The Court answered the referred question in the affirmative, holding that the sales of patasa, harda, and alchidana were exempt from tax under entry 47 of Schedule A to the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959.
Judgment
DESAI, C. J.
( 1 ) THIS is a reference under section 61 (1) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. The opponents are registered dealers dealing inter alia in "patasa", "harda" and "alchidana". The opponents requested the Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax (Appeals), Gujarat State, Ahmedabad, to determine under section 52 (l) (e) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, whether any tax was payable in respect of the sales of "patasa", "sakar", "bura sugar", "harda" and "alchidana". Along with their application, they sent two copies of bills Nos. 46, 85 and 92 dated respectively 2/05/1960, 1/07/1960, and 9/07/1960. The Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax held that the sale of "bura sugar" was exempt from tax as the item was covered by entry 47 of Schedule A to the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, whilst the sales of other articles were covered by entry 22 of Schedule E to the Act and tax was payable on them. By a further order dated 3/10/1960, the Deputy Commissioner rectified the earlier order and held that the other articles were covered, not by entry 22 of Schedule E, but by entry 31 of Schedule C to the Act. The Commissioner of Sales Tax in revision, by his order dated 24/10/1960, held that "sakar" (sugar-candy) was a form of sugar and was covered by the definition of sugar in entry 47 of Schedule A and was also exempt from tax. He held that articles like "patasa", "harda" and "alchidana" were products of sugar and not sugar as such in any form. The matter was carried further before the Sales Tax tribunal. The tribunal held that "patasa", "harda" and "alchidana" should be treated as forms of sugar and not sweets or products of sugar and were covered by entry 47 of Schedule A and were exempt from tax. At the instance of the State of Gujarat, this reference has been made for the determination of the following questions:
" (1) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the sales of patasa, harda and alchidana (small lumps of sugar) effected by the opponents under their bills Nos. 46 and 92 dated 2/05/1960, and 9/07/1960, respectively are exempt from the payment of all taxes leviable under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, adapted to the State of Gujarat by virtue of entry 47 in Schedule A to the said Act ?
(2) Whether the sales of patasa, harda and alchidana by the opponents can be regarded as the sales of sweets and sweetmeats within the meaning of entry 31 of Schedule C to the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, or whether such sales should be covered by entry 22 of Schedule E to the Act?"the tribunal has clarified the fact that "alchidana" or small lumps of sugar referred to by them did not contain any edible articles such as seeds of cardamom or groundnuts but were pure lumps of sugar. In the judgment of the tribunal it has been observed as under:-
"if the chemical composition of the articles is to be taken as a guide in interpreting the entry 47 there is no doubt that patasa, harda and the alchidana are merely different forms of sugar as defined by the central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. We were informed that a small portion of hydrogen sulphide is passed through the sugar solution for bleaching purposes after which patasas are prepared by splashing the solution on a piece of wood which converts the sugar into amorphous sugar, the hardas are prepared by pouring the solution into moulds which is then allowed to cool and the alchidanas are prepared by rapidly passing the solution of appropriate thickness through a sieve so as to convert it into granulated lumps of sugar. But whatever the process these articles are only forms of refined sugar with the requisite sucrose content. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . After undergoing all the process, the articles continue to be sugar as defined by the Excises and Salt Act and the fact that they are distributed on festive occasions will not make them anything else than sugar on that account. It may be noted that it is possible to convert any of these articles into other articles by dissolving them
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.