SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(SC) 300

G.L.MITTAL, K.N.WANCHOO, K.S.HEGDE, R.S.BACHAWAT
INCOME TAX OFFICER,tuticorin – Appellant
Versus
T. S. Devinatha Nadar – Respondent


Judgment

G. K. MITTER

( 1 ) THIS group of five appeals by special leave arises out of a common order made under Art. 226 of the Constitution of the High Court of Judicature at Madras. The appeals involve the interpretation of S. 35 (5) of the Income-tax Act, l922.

( 2 ) THE facts in Civil Appeal No. 2154 of 1966 - relevant for the disposal of the appeal, taken by way of sample, are as follows. The respondent along with his four brothers were partners of a registered firm carrying on business in gunnies. The assessment of the firm for the year l943-44 was completed on 22/01/1946 and the share Income of each partner was determined at Rs. 8,265. The assessment of the respondent as individual was completed on 24/01/1946 wherein was included his income from the partnership just noted. Subsequently, the assessment of the firm was reopened by proceedings under S. 34 (1) (a) of the Act and a sum of Rs. 90,000 was added to the income of the firm liable to be brought to tax. The notice under S. 34 was issued on 11/09/1952 and the reassessment of the firm took place of 30/05/1959. On 24/07/1959 notice under S. 35 (5) of the Act was served on the respondent for rectification of his assessment as

















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top