SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(SC) 345

G.N.RAY, K.JAYACHANDRA REDDY
NARAYAN SINGHS man SINGH – Appellant
Versus
State Of M. P. – Respondent


Judgment

( 1 ) THESE appeals are filed under Section 379 of the Code of Criminal procedure. These five appellants along with two others were tried for offences punishable under S. 395, 396, 397 and 449 of the Indian Penal Code. Two of them were tried under Section 25 read with Section 27 of the Arms Act. Mithlesh was tried for offences punishable under S. 216 and 412 Indian Penal Code. The trial court acquitted all of them. The State preferred an appeal. During the pendency of the appeal the two accused Devi Singh and Kishore Singh died and the appeal against them stood abated.

( 2 ) THE High court, however, relying on the evidence of the eyewitnesses who participated in the identification parade and the recovery effected allowed the appeal and set aside the acquittal and convicted Mansingh, Rati Ram, narayan Singh and Shiv Ratan under S. 395/397, 396 and 449 Indian Penal Code and sentenced each of them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years under each count. Rati Ram was further convicted under Section 25 read with Section 27 of the Arms Act and sentenced to undergo three years rigorous imprisonment. Mithlesh was convicted under Section 412 Indian Penal Code and sentenced t








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top