SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(SC) 290

B.P.JEEVAN REDDY, N.VENKATACHALA
NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. – Appellant
Versus
State Bank of India – Respondent


Judgment

( 1 ) HEARD the counsel for the parties. Leave granted.

( 2 ) THIS appeal is directed against the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Punjab and Haryana High court allowing the second appeal preferred by the first respondent. The plaintiff-respondent. State Bank of India had financed the purchase of a truck by the first defendant. Defendants 2 and 3 were guarantors. On the first defendant failing to repay the loan as stipulated, the plaintiff-Bank instituted a suit for recovering the amount against defendants 1 to 3. Pending the suit the truck got burnt whereupon the plaintiff impleaded the appellant herein, National Insurance Company Limited, as the fourth defendant. The appellants case was that the first defendant had deliberately and intentionally set fire to the truck and, therefore, the Insurance Company is not liable to pay the insurance amount. On a consideration of the evidence placed before it, the trial court held that fourth defendant (appellant herein) has failed to establish that the truck was set on fire deliberately by the first defendant. In view of the Insurance Policy issued by the fourth defendant, the suit was decreed in favour of the Bank making t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top