SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 382

J.S.VERMA, SUJATA V.MANOHAR
Centre for Public Interest Litigation – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Judgment

( 1 ) ). In this writ petition which has been brought in public interest, the exercise of discretion in allotment of retail outlets for petroleum products, LPG Dealership and SKO Dealership by the central government is challenged. It is urged that there are no guidelines to regulate the exercise of discretion in the matter of such allotments which results in exercise of the discretion arbitrarily.

( 2 ) ). After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, we requested the learned Attorney general to submit a draft of the proposed guidelines to regulate exercise of the discretionary power in the matter of such allotments in the light of the suggestions made on behalf of the petitioner at the hearing. The learned Attorney General submitted a draft of the proposed guidelines together with the general conditions on which the applicants may be chosen for making the allotments. In addition, the learned Attorney General also indicated certain details for being inserted in the brochure of guidelines for selection of dealers available with all the oil companies.

( 3 ) ). To ensure the exercise of discretion in making such allotments in conformity with the rule of law by excluding t


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top