SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
GOPAL KRISHNA SHARMA
VERSUS
State of Rajasthan
DECIDED ON: September 16, 1992
Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 32, 226 - Udaipur University Act, 1962 - Section 2 (j) -Universities Teachers and officers (Special Conditions of Service) Act, 1974 –implemented –UGC - Teaching staff - It may be noticed that the UGC in its report (1975-76) recommended upward revision of pay scales of University and College teachers, which recommendation came to be approved by the Government of India. According to the said recommendation three pays scales were approved for University and College teachers, these being for Lecturers and Assistant Professors, for Readers for Professors replacing the then prevailing pay scales of respectively, with effect. Research Assistants who claim to belong to the teaching faculty claimed the lowest pay scale which the University had refused to grant notwithstanding a host of representations. They further contended that the benefit of the revised UGC scale was also extended to Junior Lecturers who were then in the scale. The Indian Council of Agriculture Research (ICAR) had also clarified in its communication, that it makes no distinction between academic, research and extension work in Agricultural Universities and had extended the benefit of the revised UGC scales to Extension/ Research Assistants also if they possessed the qualifications of Lecturer and were recognised as teachers under the University Statutes Held, That may be so but that -is no ground to deny to the employees what is due to them in law. In fact the employees can make a grievance that what was due to them had been illegally withheld and hence the University should be directed to pay the difference with interest. However, we would leave it to the authorities to work out a scheme with sufficient incentives e. g. depositing the arrears (difference) in Provident Fund or the like and giving an option to the employees to avail of that benefit if they so desire. That should however be done not later than three months. We also direct the authorities to calculate the difference payable to the employees within four months from today and pay the same to the employees, under a scheme, if any, as per employees option, or if no scheme is prepared, in cash. The amount to be paid by way of difference in salary will be spread over yearwise for income-tax purposes. -. Since the educational requirements, process of selection and job-charts are almost identical such a scheme can be of mutual benefit to the employees as well as the University, the employees getting security of tenure and University getting experienced hands. We would expect the University to examine the feasibility of preparing such a scheme at an early date. Order accordingly.
JUDGMENT
AHMADI, J.
( 1 ) THIS batch of Writ Petitions brought under Art. 32 of the Constitution arises on account of the respondent Universitys refusal to grant Research Assistants/ Associates the scale of Rs. 700-1600 recommended by the University Grants Commission (UGC) with effect from 1/01/1973, even though the University, namely, the Sukhadia University, Rajasthan, (earlier known as University of Udaipur) has implemented the UGC recommendations and granted the UGC scales in the case of other members of the teaching staff. It may be noticed that the UGC in its report (1975-76) recommended upward revision of pay scales of University and College teachers, which recommendation came to be approved by the Government of India. According to the said recommendation three pays scales were approved for University and College teachers, these being Rs. 700-1600 for Lecturers and Assistant Professors, Rs. 1200-1900 for Readers and Rs. 1500-2500 for Professors replacing the then prevailing pay scales of Rs. 400-950, Rs. 700-1250 and Rs. 1100-1600, respectively, with effect from 1-1-73. Research Assistants who claim to belong to the teaching faculty claimed the lowest pay scale of Rs. 700-1600 which the University had refused to grant notwithstanding a host of representations. They further contended that the benefit of the revised UGC scale of Rs. 700-1600 was also extended to Junior Lecturers who were then in the scale of Rs. 300-600. The Indian Council of Agriculture Research (ICAR) had also clarified in its communication dated June 26/07/1977, that it makes no distinction between academic, research and extension work in Agricultural Universities and had extended the benefit of the revised UGC scales to Extension/ Research Assistants also if they possessed the qualifications of Lecturer and were recognised as teachers under the University Statutes. The Vice-Chancellor of the respondent University had also written a letter dated 14- 15/12/1976 to the Education Commissioner of the State Government to extend the benefit of the revised UGC scales to Junior Lecturers/ Research Assistants/ Extension Assistants as they belonged to the teachers category. While the claim was approved in the case of Junior Lecturers, it came to be spurned in the case of Research Assistants even though Research Assistants of Agricultural Universities in the States of Haryana (Hissar), Punjab (Ludhiana) and Himachal Pradesh were placed in the scale of Rs. 700-1600. The petitioners also relied on a letter dated 17-12-77 of the Under-secretary (Education), ICAR addressed to the Deputy Secretary to the Government of Rajasthan, Agriculture (Gr. II) Department, Jaipur, wherein it is stated that Research and Extension staff declared Teachers under the University Statute would be eligible for the UGC revised pay scale. The petitioners further point out that the post of Research Assistant in the University was equivalent to that of Junior Lecturer, being in the same scale of Rs. 300-600 and when by Notification dated 2-7-74, Statute 47 (1) came to be amended and the expression junior Lecturer in clause (v) thereof came to be substituted by the expression lecturer, persons holding equivalent posts in the same pay scale were given the same nomenclature by the Registrars subsequent notification dated 7-9-77. This was so because, contend the petitioners, they fell within the definition of teacher in section 2 (j) of the Udaipur University Act, 1962 which runs as under :
" (J) teacher means a person appointed or recognised by the University for the purpose of instruction or conducting and guiding research or extension programmes and includes a person who may be declared by the statute to be a teacher. "
THE petitioners, therefore, contend that a person who is appointed by the University for conducting and guiding research falls within the scope and ambit of the above definition and hence there is no room for any doubt that a Research Assistant employed for conducting and guiding
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.