K.RAMASWAMY, N.M.KASLIWAL
PARBATI DEVI JAISWAL – Appellant
Versus
KEDAR LAL JAISWAL – Respondent
( 1 ). Special leave granted.
( 2 ). The facts of the case are that the said premises were leased out by sourendra Nath Mukherjee and Rabindra Nath Mukherjee in favour of a partnership firm, namely, M/s Thakurdin Ramjosh as back as on 7/9/1949. A partition took place between Sourendra Nath Mukherjee and Rabindra Nath mukherjee by virtue of a written deed of partition dated 16/7/1962. The property in question was allotted to the share of Sourendra Nath Mukherjee. Sourendra Nath Mukherjee then filed a Suit No. 636 of 1968 on 19-9-1968 in the City Civil court, Calcutta against the partnership firm, namely, M/s thakurdin Ramjosh for recovery of possession of the premises.
( 3 ). The suit was decreed in favour of the plaintiff on 13/4/1973. M/s thakurdin Ramjosh through Kedar Lal Jaiswal filed an appeal in the High court. During the pendency of the appeal, Sourendra Nath Mukherjee executed a lease for 99 years in favour of the appellants on 10/3/1979 on receipt of , premium amounting to Rs. 1,32,125. 00. Subsequently, by a Deed of Conveyance dated 16/11/1979, the said Shri Sourendra Nath Mukherjee sold, conveyed and transferred all his rights, title, interest in the suit property in fav
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.