SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(SC) 231

S.C.AGRAWAL, M.K.MUKHERJEE
SETHIROOPLAL – Appellant
Versus
MALTITHAPAR – Respondent


JUDGMENT

MUKHERJEE, J, J.

( 1 ) SPECIAL leave granted in both the petitions.

( 2 ) IN these two appeals orders dated 2/11/1992 and 28/05/1993 passed by the High court of Punjab and Haryana in Election Petition No. 5 of 1992 are under challenge. Facts leading to the filing of these appeals and relevant for their disposal are as under

( 3 ) THE appellant and the four respondents herein contested the election of 99 Moga Assembly Constituency polling for which took place on 19/02/1992. When the results were declared it was found that Respondent 1 had secured the highest number of votes - and thereby won the election - followed by the appellant, who secured 7 votes less than her, and the other respondents. The appellant then filed the election petition assailing the election on various grounds as detailed therein. The ground, which is relevant for our present purposes, finds place in paragraph 18 of the Election Petition which reads as under:"that twenty-two bogus votes of dead electors by impersonation were cast in favour of Respondent 1 at the instance of Respondent 1 and her Supporters. The relevant details of these dead electors is annexed along with as Annx. P-9. "

( 4 ) IN course of t








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top