SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(SC) 1275

B.P.JEEVAN REDDY, SUJATA V.MANOHAR
State Of Orissa – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


JUDGMENT

SUJATA V. MANOHAR, J.

( 1 ) LEAVE granted.

( 2 ) THIS appeal by special leave is filed at the instance of the State of orissa against an order of a division bench of the High court of orissa holding that awrit application filed by the State of orissa under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to challenge the decision of the central government dated 10/5/1978 in Revision Application No. 2/299/77-MV, was not maintainable, The facts giving rise to this appeal are as follows:

( 3 ) THE State of orissa is the owner of mines and minerals within its territorial jurisdiction. The grant by the State of mining leases and licences is regulated by the provisions of the Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 and the Mineral Concession Rules, 1960. The State of orissa had granted a mining lease for manganese ore over an area of 830 acres in Village Balda under Champua Sub-Division of Keonjhar District in the State of orissa to one M/s Serajuddin and Co. for a term of 20 years effective from 3/12/1957. Subsequently on 2/6/1962 a coterminous mining lease for iron ore over the above area was also executed in favour of M/s Serajuddin and Co. Both these leases we















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top